Julius Caesar

Brutus and discoloration Antony are analogous in their speeches because of the timing of the speeches. some(prenominal) Brutus and Mark Antony had to play off of the conclave immediately afterwards Caesar was slay. If Caesar hadnt been murdered just minutes before Brutus and Mark Antony spoke, their speeches would leave never happened. The speeches were also similiar in the aspect that niether Brutus nor Mark Antony had while to pay off for their speeches, the noblemen spoke what was on their mind without censoring their feelings and their beliefs. On the former(a) hand, the speeches are distinct in their motive. Mark Antony believes that Caesar shouldnt live with been killed and that he would be best for capital of Italy, where Brutus believes that he killed Caesar for the best of capital of Italy and that Caesar would have been a tyrant. Even though the speeches are correspondent in word choice, the context of the word ambitious is opposite in each of their speeches . Brutus uses the word to explain how he persuasion that Caesar was in over his head, where Mark Antony feels as if Caesar was ambitious in he had hopes and dreams for Rome. > Lastly, the pairs speeches were different in their enthusiasm. Brutus is almost stoic in his speech, where Mark Antony is nearly in tears at honest points in his speech.> Even after the death of Julius Caesar, his legacy is static continuing in Rome. Brutus and Mark Antony both spoke to the convocation right after the event of Caesars murder, but were different in emotions and intentions in their speeches.If you want to get a full essay, phrase it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper