Case Study on Childrens Families Intervention

Introduction The affectionate utilisation dish up has changed dramatic exclusivelyy inwardly the maskference of baby bird auspices. The following paper will discuss the passage oer the last three decades. Also it discusses the important changes including some methods and skills which have developed. In addition a background of the crisis disturbance is discussed. The legal deal has alike been in truth influential at bottom changing the adjoin especially the Childrens Act 1989. This is clearly discussed within this paper. A critical analysis of the growth is acceptd, with paying particular oversight to ethics and values.The early childhood protection intervention has been transferred from a child-oriented approach, whereby intervention was mainly centraliseed directly towards the child. This surgery is now 1 of a modest collection of pilot projects to matchless compromising of a multidimensional domain of theory. While in the mid-seventies childhood protection w as changing to a new era, which consisted of significant fond changes. Society began to introduce a new system of developing blockading work to support children and families. This created a much needed support for families, consisting of playfulness groups and youth clubs.The early methods apply within the childhood intervention was exceedingly weak whereby quantifyments were not al delegacys undertaken or completed with no accent mark on age limits to complete minds. The analysis lieu was weak and teentsy planning was provided. There was little emphasis on social workers reflectively fashioning notes, with no clear reasons or expectations for the basis of intervention. These methods then highlighted original issues which consisted of duplication and repetition of information. Furthermore information was not shared freely to incorporate a multiagency perspective.The intervening process has been changed to one of a great economic, social and technological change to comp romise a holistic approach. before prospicient intervention focuses on the service drug substance abuser be the centre of the work with a personalised process. One process frequently used within child protection is the crisis intervention. Its suppositious origins have risen from varied sources and comprised one of a psychoanalytic thinking perspective. Crisis intervention was highlighted by Lindemann (1944) study of heartbreak with the reactions of survivors and relatives after a night club fire.He concluded that they all shared five similar reactions of guilt, hostility, pre occupation with the image of the deceased, somatic sorrow and loss of pattern of conduct. Lindemann also found that people needed encouragement to morn. Caplin (1964) goes on to explain that the problem in which an idiosyncratic faces stimuli which signals danger to a fundamental need satisfaction and the dowery are such that habitual problem solving methods are unsuccessful within the prison term span of past expectations of success(Caplin 1964).Rapoport (1967) conceptualised the intervention process particular within the initial re-create, referred to now as sagaciousness. In which clients should have immediate admission price to workers in a crisis situation. The crisis intervention has now go on to enchant make do capabilities within the immediate crisis and not focus on long term therapies such at C. B. T, which can be followed up ulterior when the service user has emerged from the initial crisis. Roberts (1991) designed a seven stage model of crisis intervention, which is to be used as a guide for assessing.He also believed solution- focused therapy should be incorporated at the same time as the crisis intervention. Roberts also states that crisis intervention should culminate with a restoration of cognitive functioning, crisis resolution and cognitive mastery (Roberts 2000) However a critic perspective is that if such intervention is not handled correctly it may cause warp reality, maladaptive coping strategies, OHagan (1991) believes it is time limited, within a reconstructive period. Parker (1992) designed a crisis intervention flow diagram which is used to assess a referral to crisis intervention.The crisis theory is used to optimise social functioning therefore enabling choices and maximising respect, so the service user can give themselves and live an independent life. Although the crisis intervention process has moved forward, it may overleap in some aspects of diversity to take into account of different cultures, societies because it was more often than not developed in a western framework therefore it consists some western cultural assumptions . Middleton (1970) locates the process of assessment firmly in the place setting of social work values and states respect for individual difference is primaeval if the rocess is not going to dis empower the individual but enhance their strengths and coping abilities. The current asses sment process is now seen as an art and intelligence and in context is much more dedicated towards social workers involving wisdom, skills, to prise diversity and equality. With using a human diversity framework process. Clifford (1998) disembowels the inter connected elements in assessment. As assessment has to partake of scientific, theoretical, artistic, ethical and matter-of-fact elements (Clifford 1998). sagacitys are now seen as an ongoing fluid and dynamic process and social workers are using this framework. It helps to positively acknowledge that development and changes in peoples lives is a never-ending process. (Hepworth, Rooney and Larsen 1997) suggested a second way to categorise assessment in social work is within a time specific formulation. The processes of assessments include the notion of Fooks (2002) joint construction of a narrative exchange model, by making the service user the expert.Coulshed and Orme (2006) describe how assessments may be understood by it s core processes, its purpose of theoretical base. The theoretical base may also influence the process of assessment and could be related to that similar of personal values and beliefs. The assessment process has changed from one of service led process, which but focused on pathology and appeared to veer service users strengths to change. To a personalised process whereby placing the focus on service user involvement at the centre of intervention.By using this in assessment it can positively build on service users strengths to help ensure anti oppressive practice, with an emphasis on self responsibility. Saleeby states the strengths perspectives focuses on positives with the intention of increasing motivation, capacity and potential for making real and assured life choice (Saleeby, D. 2006). With an emphasis on using the C. P. R model. sagaciousnesss undertaken now are to consider a wide variant of factors for example the environment, living system, culture and diversity which can impact on the service user. mixer workers are now adopting new approaches in assessment for example to think out of the box . Therefore insuring a multi disciplinal approach and holistic overview to take into consideration all aspects of the service users life. The principles of intervention and assessment are to insure it is child-centred using informed child development theorys within the framework to raise equality. With involving interagency services to build strengths, with the understanding that it will be a continuous process to adopt change and empower service users.The Department of health (2000) published its own framework for assessment to ensure assessments secure the surface being of children and provides a systematic way of analysing children within their family and wider community. This framework pays attention to the decree of the Childrens Act 1989. The legal parley is a contest domain it has influenced the process of child intervention in many ways. As d efined by Ball (1996) the body of rules whereby a civilized cabaret maintains order and regulates its internal affairs as between one individual and another, and between individuals and the state (Ball 1996).Legal deal is divided into two areas, the statutory law which is the current legislation. The childrens Act (1989) was implemented to change the process of intervention to ensure all children are protected not just vulnerable children, which was the main focus of previous intervention. This changed the assessment process to include many children from different backgrounds and cultures, making this law highlighted the importance that a child from any background and culture is protected. Earlier intervention seemed to focus on the lower, working class or families in poverty.The act sets out guidelines to farm and ensure social welfare and equality for all children. The act promotes that children should be stovepipe kept within the family home unless the case is in extreme cir cumstances of abuse or neglect. Bowlby highlights that children need secure attachment, therefore promoting the well being of all children within their family unit. Children were no longer removed as quick from their family surrounds and placed into institutions and care for the fear of maternal depravation. Bowlbys theory highlighted, if a child does not form a secure attachment it could importantly impair their future mental health.Another aspect of legal discourse is the case law which was established by previous case cogitates and case findings. It can be referred to, to help change legislation and to avoid unnecessary mistakes within the intervention process the laming report (2003) was used in this way to help to ensure no further such cases as the tragic death of Victoria Climbie would occur again. The legal discourse is used to promote social work values and ethics, thus ensuring social justice to protect and ensure the wellbeing of all children.However a critic can be tak en from (Dung 1984) he is concerned that scorn a veneer of objectivity and neutrality. Statutory law can be used as a vehicle to improve Eurocentric and lower-middle-class norms on working class and non- European families. Conclusion In cobblers last to this paper it can be clearly seen that assessment and intervention has moved forward in the last three decades to place the service user at the centre of involvement, to empower and enhance their quality of life. It now promotes the wellbeing of all children not just the vulnerable.Bowlbys attachment theory is very much used within social work and has influenced the legal discourse and practice of social work . As we can see the crisis intervention as positively moved forward by the influence of versatile theorists. Legal discourse is important to ensure we can learn by our practice by case laws and the statutory law insurers equality and protection. References Coulshed V & Orme, J. (2006) Social playact dedicate An introductio n (4th Edition). Basingstoke Palgrave MacMillan. Clifford, D (1998). Social Assessment Theory and Practice a Multi-disciplinary Framework.Aldershot Ashgate. Howe, D (1992). An Introduction to Social grow Theory. Aldershot Arena Fook, J (2002) Social Work Critical Theory and Practice London. Sage Fowler J (2003) A Practitioners Tool for Child Protection and the Assessment of Parents. London Jessica Kingsley. Healy, K. (2005). Social Work Theories in Context. Basingstoke. Palgrave Macmillan Hepworth, D. Rooney, R & Larsen, JA (1997). Direct Social Work Practice Theory and Skills (5th Edition). London Brooks Cole Publishing. Laming H (2003). Victoria Climbie Inquiry Report C.M 5730 London The Stationary percentage Middleton, L (1997) The Art of Assessment Birmingham Venture Press OHagan, K (1986) Crisis disturbance in Social Work Basingstoke MacMillan Parker, J. (2007b). The Process of Social Work Assessment, Planning, Intervention and review in M Lymbery & K. Postle (Eds) Social Wo rk. A confederate for learning London. Sage. Payne, M (2005) Modern Social Work Theory (3rd Edition), Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan Roberts A, (2000) Crisis Intervention Handbook. Oxford University Press Saleeby, D. (2006). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice (4th Ed. ). wise York Pearson/Allyn and Bacon