Barry Glassner’s The Culture of Fear Essay

The murder of thousands of Ameri whoremasters on their own soil on September 11, 2001 created a new sequence in unify States History the era of attention. That is the finding Barry Glassner, author of The market-gardening of disquietude Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things. In the retains pages is found a thorough examination of why Americans argon hero-worshipful, why they bent, and what this affirms ab extinct the average citizen. It is non to say that Glassner indicates that Americans do, or should, conk in fear of unexpected terrorist attack.Rather, his purpose in writing is to crystallise why it is that Americans fear the wrong things and fail to act on the cover fears he cites examples such(prenominal) as fearing shootings on school founds, whole not limiting access to guns. In other words, he is attempting to describe what fear is like in the grow of America and what it says about reality and perception. That is his thesis. Summed up, Glassner writes that when it comes to fear, Americans consist in a culture of false paranoia and irrational paradoxes. His methodology comes through blankly.He utilizes individual case studies to coherently and cohesively build a operose unified theory. Each story and topic becomes one to a greater extent brick in the foundation of his thesis. In that way he easily compels and convinces all but the most cynical reader. Finally, it is Glassners betoken of view that rattling plant life wonders. He acts as if he is but a casual, though analytical, purpose observer. What Does the Author Have to Say? Fear can be created and manipulated. eon and again Glassner returns to the example of the events of September 11, 2001 for treasures with which to bolster his theory.It is indeed ripe ground for that. It seems to be the case study for that why American citizens are paranoid for all of the wrong reasons. Yes, the terrorist attacks were awful, and all the much so because 1) they were completely unexpected and unannounced, and 2) they targeted the innocent civilian populace. That being said, writes Glassner, they were likewise completely anomalous. The fear of such an attack in the future due to the fact that it noticeed at one time before is unjustifiable.It had been two hundred and twenty-five years from the beginnings of the United States for such an attack to occur, and as of this tenth anniversary edition of the book it has been some other ten years without such attack. Sure, that is not to say that it couldnt risk again. However, the accuse that the author makes is that it is just circumstances like this that are impregnable breeding ground for manipulators. In this case, he cites the then on-going efforts of chairperson George W. Bush to convince the population that there was an active war on terror.This war, he reminded frequently, was directed at the American citizen, the mom and pop on the street. The war could reach every home, every business. The entire country was beneath various alert conditions at all times. This supports the first main point of The Culture of Fear. Fear can be a force of handling and creation. The second point of the book is closely related to its main premise. It is the ongoing effects of a mass media accentuating the most unlikely of nuisances. Each and every day the media, including the press, the internet, and the television networks, blares out stories of kidnappings, murders and more.The chief aim seems to be that it could happen to you. In fact, it probably volition happen to you unless you take precautions daily. Fingerprint your children. update your photographs and dental records. Plant microchips in your childrens skin. Anything to do to escape the boogeyman, because undoubtedly hes out there. Never mind the fact that more often than not, the statistics behind the reports are skewed mightily to prove these points ex post facto. The announcements alone are proof enough for most people. The cult ure of fear is encouraged, and bought into.After all, the media is a powerful presence. When it comes to the third point, it becomes somewhat nebulose as to how some things come about. Glassner relates example after(prenominal) example of mankind policy responses to these scenarios and how they absolutely fail to deal with the actual situations that spawn the fear. In other words, ineffective public policy is the knee jerk reply to fear. The author is quick to relate such failures. He points out the arc number of dollars allocated to these efforts and the startling statistics that show the problem has not formd at all.Also, he is not shy at pointing out that this culture of fear and answer provides great political opportunity for candidates that are tough on crime to emerge, ready to raise the banners of various well-meaning causes. Once the candidates become elective officials, any the cause is dropped along with its passion, or new laws are passed that in essence are jus t excuses to spend money and advance political careers. Criticism of the Author I greatly enjoyed this book. I will be unequivocal about that. Perhaps it biases my review, but I do yield points to support my response.To begin with, the book is well-paced. By that I mean to say that it reads well. Much of non-fiction foundericularly educated and researched non-fiction is dry, and fails to engage the reader in the perceive that its subjects remain remote. Granted, Glassner has a subject that is more than more accessible to readers than the normal tome, but he does not bore with statistics or inane stories. He moves the action right along by showing readers why this involves them, and why it should naturally interest them. Each chapter begins with a premise that is readily understandable.It also includes a counterpoint and then the fun begins. Every chapter delivers. There is a natural satisfaction to this and makes reading the book enjoyable. I never experient a more well plan ned out book, in this regard. I was never left wondering why something was missing, or what the authors point was after all. He provides vignettes that most every reader either has knowledge of, or direct experience with. In that regard, the book around reads like a continuous narrative, full of intrigue and personal connections. What strike me in particular were the findings of the author.He clearly exposed the myths behind much of the countrys fears fears that turn out to be close to entirely fictitious or so improbable as to be nearly laughable. Then he does something important and which caused my surprise. He listed the fears that all Americans should actually be concerned with. These are the issues that most citizens will encounter on a daily basis and should be giving their attention rather than the stories at the top of newspaper headlines. Motor vehicle injuries, drowning, fires, head injuries to children from bike accidents, these are the realities of danger in America .And these can be prevented. Safer vehicles, more restrictive drivers licenses, and bicycle helmet laws these are the tools of the fearful citizen that can bring some peace to life. I never thought that Glassner would make such a strong point out of such mundane information. It made me want to actually change my personal living styles, and not in the manner of investing in gas masks or bunkers. Naturally, the book is not perfect. Probably the greatest weakness is the ability of it to be dismissed as a big brass bashing book. It could be accused of having an agenda.It is fairly heavy handed when it comes to discussing the media and the governments efforts at propagating fears among the population. Perhaps Glassner could pay helped himself some by providing statistical psychoanalysis of actual terrorist linked events over the course of the century. This may cook more convincingly pointed out just how anachronistic the terror attacks of Fall 2001 really were, and remain. Rather t han describe the governments reaction to it, he could have simply left it at that and trusted the reader to draw his or her own conclusions.But that is a small point. One area that could have been covered differently is that chapter on Youth at Risk. With a render of Faulty Diagnoses and Callous Cures one would expect that it would be a medically related chapter. Indeed that it is. However, I feel that the chapter rather disregards the pervasive opinion and angst that this generation seems to be finding themselves in. It would appear at least from mutual experience that these troubles which are leading to more and more suicides and bullying are real and worth a serious look.It is not as if Glassner just glosses over these things, but I call in that his overall take on the situation is not serious enough. He instead appears to have it out for the medical establishment. Some could say that this trivializes the problems that teens today are undergoing. I think that would be an accu rate indictment. The chapter could either have been more aimed that direction, or by chance could be eliminated altogether as a general fear among the United States population at large. SummationBarry Glassners book The Culture of Fear is one to be read. It is quite easy to recommend. Primarily it is because the books audience is also the general population. Every reader would know a potential reader in a neighbor, co-worker, relative. Glassner makes his point very clear the culture of fear is absolutely pervasive. We are all a part of this society that lives in near constant paranoia over things that probably will never happen and we ignore what we probably should fear on a daily basis.That is what is so ultimately compelling about the book. It is nearly a handbook for peaceful living. The Culture of Fear makes promises through its introduction and its chapter titles, and it delivers. The prose is taciturn and clearly understandable. The scenarios, likewise, are situations in wh ich nearly every reader can either imagine, or has actually experienced. This lends an instant authority and trustworthiness to the book. And after all, where there is trustworthy authority, there is careful consideration of fears itself.